Products 1 – 10 of 15 Buy Now · Navtech Europe Supplement. AERAD Buy Now · Navtech Flight Guide Poland to Urals, & to SE Europe to Greece &. AERAD. If you are a UK-based aviator you will know about Aerad, and you will also know about Jeppesen. If you are based anywhere else in the world you will know. In addition to Aerad’s range of Flight Guide Supplements a larger range of accessories have been brought out to complement the main guides. £ (Non- VAT.
|Published (Last):||18 July 2013|
|PDF File Size:||15.39 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.2 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Whatever happened to the concept of customer service?
Aerad Flight Information Supplement – IFR Supplements & Accessories – Pilot Warehouse
Aviation is the most unintelligent profession I have ever been involved with! To address some of the main criticisms above: It strikes me there is a flight safety issue involved here so maybe everyone should contact the UKFSC based at Fairoaks last I heard to express their concerns.
The new format is also compatible with the navigation database and will make it possible to meet the quality and traceability standards expected from Eurocontrol. Have they had any pilot input to put inforrmation together? Perhaps it’s time for everyone who hates the new format to lobby their flt ops department and get them to vote with their feet.
If they are NAVTECH much better on the ground but hate any of the airbourne plates they are so difficult to understand and full of shall we say “differing” information from the origional Aerad plates, and I am used to using both Aerad and Jepps! It couldn’t be more close to the truth but at least we’re being listened to. In general I find the new format pretty easy to get my head around.
Aerad Flight Information Supplement
Net result will, I know, be an increase in the time spent updating the things. Why can’t we retain the lines on the altitudes if we prefer that presentation? Why are the notes now scattered all over the shop, instead of being in a neat numbered list as before? An example was elevation: I pity anyone not familiar with the place trying to navigate by this chart and can’t understand why it hasn’t being withdrawn yet.
To be honest, I doubt this will be necessary. Navtech based in Waterloo, Canada is the owner of the company.
Not too long now, you all can have my world soon!!!!!! Its not been old! If these charts cause informstion safety hazard, MOR it!
As ravfooty said, the EU-ops minima are now on the chart and most captains I’ve flown with so far have been unaware of the fact that the JAR-ops minima we use are at the back.
On the old charts it had a note which explained about North Atlantic departures and if you had to get the oceanic clearance before departing depending on entry point. In theory, the engine fail procedures on the plates should be specific to the company using them.
Under the old format the page numbers were big and bold and in the top right hand corner of the page.
On a positive note the ground pages are more concise. Slightly off topic here but correct me if i’m wrong: The manufacturer will then go bust.
I did my first trip with these charts last week from Prestwick. The 4d altitude check on the glide is now ambiguous wihtout careful studying where there is a separate DME for an ILS. Glad to be a Jepp user again.: I for one have phoned these guys at Walton on Thames and got the story first hand. Ready to have my head shot off Hello, is this the ‘Happy Pilots Fly Jeppesen’, thread?
Aerad charts which were the best and clearest I have used. I’m sure that if a journalist got hold of flihgt fact that our safety standards are being compromised because of these plates something would be done about them. Many thanks for your constructive comments although as usual some have tried to turn it into Aerad v Jeppesen debate. With the fairly large caveat that I have yet use them in a darkened cockpit I actually rather like them and would say with a little tweaking large character font in some places for instance that they are an improvement on the old charts but still nothing like as good as the original spec.
They have complicated the missed approach procedures beyond belief, among other things.: